Es decir, somos hipócritas con nosotros mismos, lo que tiene mérito.
En Social Democracy for The XXI Century, el autor nos plantea que pensemos si, para la negritud africana, sería aceptable que fuera demográficamente reemplazada por europeos blancos asimilados a la cultura y lengua del lugar. Es obvio que no, al menos que uno sea un hipócrita, lo que no es ciertamente el negro que dijera que no. Ídem para China, India, etc. Un poco de sinceridad no nos vendría mal.
As for the ethnic issue, even on this subject, conservative Republicans can’t even state the obvious: would it be acceptable for native Africans to be demographically replaced by white Europeans assimilated into African cultures and speaking native African languages?
Would it be acceptable for native Chinese, Japanese, South Asians, and Arabs to be demographically replaced by white Europeans assimilated into these respective cultures and speaking the native languages of China, Japan, South Asia and the Middle East? We would then have a world where ethnic Africans, Chinese, Japanese, South Asians, and Arabs have disappeared, and been replaced by white Europeans, even if they were assimilated Europeans. Diversity – which is supposedly so beloved by the Left – would have actually significantly decreased in the world.
The answer to these questions is: no, it’s not acceptable to just demographically replace native Africans, Chinese, Japanese, South Asians, etc. with assimilated Europeans.
It’s an outrageous – and even an evil – idea. E.g., native Africans have a right to their historic homelands in Africa, which should remain majority homelands for the African people and culture of those people. The same applies to Europe and any other region or people.
Seguro que el progre más progre está de acuerdo, aunque habrá alguno que me lo discuta.